Wednesday, November 28, 2007

Boy Meets Boy

Instead of just putting my whole questioning the text paper on Boy Meets Boy on here, I'll just sum up what I wrote about.

My main question was...

Do you think this book portrayed the characters as well rounded people as opposed to focusing on their sexuality and is this important in GLBTQ literature?

I talked a lot about how David Levithan (the author) did a good job presenting his audience with well rounded characters instead of just focusing on their sexual preference. I also brought up the fact that this book seemed a little unrealistic in my eyes. This kind of scene would never happen in my high school but I think it's a nice refresher to see that EVERYONE in this book is accepted for who they are, no matter what their sexuality may be. I think Levithan creates this society to show us how things can be.

I also focused on identity. This was part of creating well-rounded, relate-able characters. I feel like as children grow up they learn who they are as individuals and through that create their own identity. I think the main character Paul helped other characters, like Tony become more comfortable with who he is and in the end gave him courage to come out to his parents. I think this can also give the readers courage to stand up for themselves and feel comfortable in their own skin.

Overall, I think this was a good, refreshing book with a new outlook that really made me think about how our society views and treats GLBTQ people.

2 comments:

Katie Fed said...

I do think that it is really important that the characters are represented as well rounded characters. But at the same time I think that I would have to question how well Levithan left out the sexual preferences of his characters. I felt that it was the first thing that was addressed when we were introduced to a new character. Also, I TOTALLY agree with the book seeming like it was a little on the unrealistic side. I enjoyed seeing everyone accepted as well, but I wondered if it would set up a fake reality for the younger audience. Granted, it is a fiction book, so its totally understandable that it be idealistic.
Also, about identity, I felt that this aspect of the book was really important and really well done. Everyone can relate to the struggles of growing up, and finding out who you are. I felt this was an aspect that made this book really quite wonderful! It was one of the first QLBTQ pieces that I have read, and I really over all enjoyed it!

Jenny said...

I think it's really interesting that you got that out of reading the text. I guess due to the fact that I was reading the text with the thought in mind that it would be about the problems of being a homosexual I completely overlooked this thought. The more I think about it the more this idea makes complete sense because I agree that the atmosphere created in the text seemed unrealistic. Therefore I feel one of the only ways it could appear to be realistic is to have it be a representation of the way life could be for a homosexual individual. The focus would be on any other realistic issue a teenager would face, such as relationship problems.